So many good webfonts!

Why limit yourself to just the same few over and over?

The other day, an article was posted on A List Apart entitled “The Rich (Typefaces) Get Richer” (thanks Roel for showing me). I’m too much of a Sozialdemokrat to want this to happen; I’m a proponent of fitting font diversity (who is alas traveling too much these days and can’t prepare images). Here is a small, subjective crop of suggestions, 10 each, off the top of my head that I would love to see more on the web, and some I wish would be used less, or never again.
 
 
Let’s use more

Sans (alphabetical order)
Alright Sans
Atlas
Brando Sans
Duplicate
Fort
Karmina Sans
Kohinoor
Panorama
Marat Sans
Output

Serifs
Benton Modern (available in many optical sizes)
Brando
Elena (I forsee a huge jump in popularity soon though)
Harriet (available in optical sizes)
Ibis (available in optical sizes)
Ingeborg
Input (serif, sans and monospaced)
Shift
Tiempos (available in optical sizes)
Yrsa
 

I’m tired of

Open Sans
FF Mark
Lato
Proxima Nova
Avenir
Brandon Grotesque
Times
Skolar
Chaparral
FF Tisa
Walsheim
Haptik
Muli
Circular
Aperçu
Brown

and all the other geometric sans-serifs and “wonky” statement grots. We need a geometric-sans-pause for at least 15 years! And please don’t use these super light styles. They are so tedious to read.

Where do you find good webfonts? That’s tricky. I could say: at any of the many wonderful type foundries and suppliers but who all have their own websites. A good starting point is fontstand.com for a large selection of independent foundries, or the small high-quality webtype.com catalog, or digging a bit more on typekit.com. Both Fontstand and Typekit have extensive filtering systems to narrow down your choices. (Check “Paragraph” on Typekit to get the better hinted fonts). Even the Google directory includes some good open source ones now. Sort by “Date added” and not the default “Popularity” or “Trending”. The newer commissioned (multi-script) typefaces are of much better quality. You could also browse fontsinuse.com or typewolf.com for inspiration among the less commonly used fonts on there.

Type foundries whos catalogs I like for various reasons and products (print, web, price, craziness, craft …) are, among others: Bold Monday, Bestsellers, Cast, Commercial Type, Darden Studio, Font Bureau, Frere-Jones Type, Indian Type Foundry, Just Another Foundry, Klim Type Foundry, Kontour, Letterror, Ludwig Type, Mickel Type, Ourtype, Okay Type, Process Type, Production Type, Rosetta, Storm Type Foundry, Suitcase Type Foundry, Type Together, Typotheque & Typonine. Go look around and beyond the safe bets of popular typefaces that are everywhere. Be more daring in your choices and combinations, but don’t compromise when it comes to rendering on screen! Only choose fonts and styles that render well in the environment and size you use them.
 

This entry was posted in Type. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

5 Comments

  1. Posted 19. May 2016 at 16:04 | Permalink

    Can add very nice Letters from Sweden with Lab Grotesque, Trim and Mikro. Also available over Fontstand.

  2. Indra Kupferschmid
    Posted 19. May 2016 at 17:49 | Permalink

    Yes, I’d have many more myself. This is a first list I typed on my phone, and I thought keeping it to 10 makes it more comparable to the Typewolf best-of list. I’ll add more, and maybe more thematically or stylistically grouped, shortly.

  3. Indra Kupferschmid
    Posted 20. May 2016 at 21:32 | Permalink

    10 more typefaces by women that I once shortlisted for the Alphabettes site:

    Abelard
    Algebra
    Bligh
    Deja Rip
    Ebony
    Equitan Sans
    Karbid (available in ~optical sizes)
    Multi (available in optical sizes)
    Stroudley
    William Text (available in optical sizes)

    I made this into its own post on Alphabettes.org

  4. Posted 31. October 2017 at 20:29 | Permalink

    Hi! I’ve been a fan of your writing/research for a while now. As a layperson, it’s difficult to judge how a webfont might read across devices/screens (unless it has a set of optical sizes, of course).

    I know that you love, as I do, the superelliptical serif. Zapf Book is my favorite but I can’t determine whether or not the digitiization would make for a good webfont at text sizes (and don’t have the budget to experiment). Do you have any thoughts on this?

  5. Indra Kupferschmid
    Posted 1. November 2017 at 01:49 | Permalink

    That’s a good question. I didn’t try Zapf Book on any website yet. I only have a phone on me right now but the standard web font by Monotype as I see it on MyFonts seems a bit tightly spaced for text sizes. (Which maybe is offsettable by adding some css tracking.) Maybe you can check out this page on the computer of your choice? It will probably just have auto-hinting though https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/itc/zapf-book/webfont_preview.html

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>